The Year2/ IP4 GP Teaching Team would like to thank a) the writers for agreeing to share their essays and b) the team of teachers who put the compilation together.
NOTE: These essays are not meant to be “model” essays for rotelearning. Use them intelligently.
10 October 2008
NJC GP Prelims 2008 ? Best Essays Q
  3. Is history merely the story told by the winners? Some people, in their attempt to simplify the concept of history, have actually come up with a new, two-syllable name for it. History is “his story” ? story of the past formularised and told by “Him”, the winner. The very fact that this phrase actually sounds like the word history itself may come as an amusing coincidence at first glance. However, upon further examination of the history of mankind itself, we realise there are some elements of relevance and truth in this renaming. History bears minimal resemblance to “story” books in literature, in so far as it does contain fictional and romanticised details, and indeed, in some cases especially in the distant past, history was solely told by the winners. However, history is much more than that. It is at its core an attempt by mankind to map human behavioural and developmental patterns. In today’s globalised and increasingly democratised world, it is for most parts fair, not favouring either the winning or losing side. It must also be noted that a large portion of history is dedicated to examining events in which there is no winner. To liken the retelling of history to an account given in a story book ? a work of fiction ? is to suggest that history, too, contains fictitious elements and is at best an illustration of a fragmented, romanticised, largely unreal truth. There is certainly a level of relevance in this argument. Let us be honest, who could have come back from the Stone Age and told historians how life was back then? Indeed, when one examines the history of pre-historic Man tens of millions of years ago, it is just an educated guess by a group of scholars on what the past could have been like. Like all kinds of speculations, this one, too, contains bias and the human innate tendency to view the past as a better and simpler time than it really was, certainly tends to inflate the good parts and paint an overly rosy picture. However, one must acknowledge the extensive effort made by modern historians to rely on empirical findings by anthropologists and palaeontologists to formulate a “story” of the past that is closest to the truth. Furthermore, modern attempts at writing history are not individual but are often collective ones that involve a group of historians, thus reducing the risk of bias and oversight. The second premise put forth by the question, that history is told by the “winners” is to some very limited extent accurate, especially when we look at how history was told in the feudalistic, monarchic past of mankind. In the times of Egyptian, Roman and more recently, Chinese, Empires, history was equivalent to the history of warfare, when kings and emperors sought to expand their territories and conquer new lands. The prevalence of one kingdom and one leader, in these battles over territories was often tantamount to the annihilation of the other, giving the winners the sole right to brag about their victory and how it had been achieved. Chinese emperors have been known to burn all artefacts and works of art that told the glorious achievements of the previous rulers and oversee the writing of a whole new range of history books that elevate the victorious to the rank alongside the Gods. One must remember that in these totalitarian regimes, the King possessed the ultimate power to dictate how history was written and understandably, that history conveniently forgot about the existence of the losers and just focused on the winners. Moreover, even after the victorious King had passed away, stories told about him by the society that reaped benefits from his conquests often contained factual distortions in a bid to honour the name of their leader. For example, King Ramses II of Egypt was ambushed during his passing of the Sinai desert and lost his life in a dishonourable way. Yet, until the late 1980s historical stories told about him did not display this part, clearly because the historians of that time chose to “forget” this about the victorious King.
However, such pseudo-historical accounts of the past that are solely determined by and therefore clearly in favour of the winners hardly exist in this modern time. The globalised and relatively open society we live in today allows for easy access to national archives and debate over versions of history across national boundaries, thus limiting factual distortions by the ruling governments. In addition, the existence of photography and video cameras has negated the possibility of atrocities committed by the victorious being simply “ignored”. History as it is taught in schools in most democratic countries nowadays is by and large a universally accepted version of what the past was like. Take for example the Cold War. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, the US under George H. W. Bush claimed victory. If Bush were the ruler of one homogenised globe, his announcement might have been put down in history textbooks as the official truth. But thankfully, he was not. Historians like John Lewis Gaddis then accessed the Soviet archives and their enduring works now presented everyone a balanced version of history that reveals not the US as the winner, but simply, the Soviet Union as the loser who gave up the war in 19
  91. Moreover, as countries now take special interest in verifying other countries’ versions of history, bias is minimised, as clearly seem in the recent outcry over the failure of Japanese history textbooks to address atrocities committed by the Japanese military in Nanjing, China, during World War Two. Clearly, the “losers” have a say in how history is written, for unlike in the far past, they are certainly not wiped out, but alive, thriving and demanding that their defeat be portrayed in the fairest possible way. Some might say that in modern authoritarian regimes such as Burma or Vietnam, surely the official histories contain a plethora of biases and half-truths. This is true, but the versions of history propagated by these regimes are not “official”, by globally accepted standards, but are nationally influenced. The fact that the world outside of these regimes is able to grab hold of a fairer version of history reaffirms the fact that history as told in our modern time is by no means merely a vehicle of propaganda by the victorious party. Moreover, the availability of different historical accounts from the West, albeit limited, in these countries has started to fuel protests demanding the governments to re-evaluate national history textbooks. We thus have reasons to believe that the global population will one day all have access to fair and objective accounts of history. One assumption made by the question which I find most flawed, is that historical accounts all contain a “winner”, suggesting that history is nothing more than the study of warfare. This is most inaccurate. History is at its core the study of human behavioural and developmental patterns to prevent the reoccurrence of past tragedies, and more often than not it does not tell the tale of any victorious country. The study of Cold War history, as mentioned above, clearly is not about any winner whatsoever, but rather is a stern warning of the dangers of leaving the fate of the world and its billions of citizens in the hands of two expansionistic superpowers. It fuels citizen activism and encourages people worldwide to exercise active citizenship and keep their leaders in check. The history of disasters, like the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant explosion, and genocidal events in Darfur or Rwanda, is not about the winners, for there is none. Rather, it activates global awareness of the need for international intervention in authoritarian regimes ruled by genocidal and greedy rulers. History also maps the scientific achievements and failures of mankind. History, to put simply, offers us a closer, largely unbiased, glimpse into how the human race has been evolving. To say that history is merely the story told by the winners is to over-generalise one of the most complex and fascinating concepts of mankind. Such understanding of the concept of history is a mere fragment of the truth, for history is about much more than the documentation of battles and conflicts where there are clear winners. Modern history is a
largely objective and educated attempt to study why and how human beings behave the way they do, and this sometimes has nothing to do with winning or losing. By Michelle Nguyen Bich Ngoc 05IP02 Marker’s Comments: An insightful answer. You could perhaps have dealt with the value of history more thoroughly.
NJC GP 2008 Prelims - Best Essays Q
  6. ‘The best way to alleviate poverty in developing nations is for richer countries to invest heavily in them.’ Discuss this view. As economies around the world continue to integrate in terms of ideas, investments and labour, the group of people opposing this trend of globalisation also continues to grow in number, as is evident in the numerous protests that are staged every time the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund have meetings. A significant majority of this group of opponents opposes the concept of foreign investments from richer countries in developing countries claiming that such investments enslave and exploit local people rather than freeing them from the cycle of poverty. However, proponents of globalisation chose to differ, claiming that such increased foreign investments have provided employment for and improved the lives of millions of people in developing countries. I believe that while such investment may be beneficial to some extent, it definitely cannot be named as the best way to free the people in developing nations from the shackles of poverty. In fact, local governments should take the initiative to develop their own industries rather than depend solely upon foreign investment, because the eventual success of foreign investment in reducing poverty levels is determined by factors such as the rate of economic growth of a country, the social outlook of its people and the efficiency of its government. The rate of economic growth of a country is an important factor that determines whether foreign investment could be successful in reducing poverty levels in developing countries. Developing nations such as India and China have attracted large amounts of foreign investments from richer countries. These foreign investments, for example, the call centres of major American companies located in India, have provided employment for thousands of Indians, many of whom were initially living below the poverty level. With a stable income from these outsourced jobs, a large proportion of the poor in India have been brought above the poverty level, and poverty levels in India have decreased from 63% in 1990 to 31% in 20
  01. However, the reason why foreign investments were successful in India is because of the high growth rates of its domestic sectors which encouraged foreign investments. This is in contrast to the effects of foreign investment in developing African countries such as Sierra Leone, where the exploitation of the workers by foreign multinational companies led to strikes and lockouts which worsened the unemployment problem and led to increased poverty levels. The reason for this was because the domestic economy of Sierra Leone had not experienced significant growth which in turn allowed foreign investments to exploit these workers by giving them low wages and making them work overtime since these workers could not switch to other jobs in domestic industries. Thus, although foreign investment might be successful in some countries, its success eventually depends upon the growth of the domestic economy which can only be driven by an efficient and pragmatic local government. Thus, the local government should take the initiative to develop the economy first before inviting foreign investments, so as to reduce poverty levels. Another factor that determines the success of foreign investment in developing countries is the mindset of the local people. Quite often, those developing countries happen to be those that recently achieved independence from foreign powers and hence, the people of these countries tend to have a sense of pride in their newfound freedom. This pride is tainted when these people have to work in foreign firms located in their own country. While these firms may provide employment and help the people escape from poverty, their presence often creates unrest among local people whom feel that they have once again been enslaved by
foreign powers. These people believe that their own country is equally capable of producing successful local firms and millionaires, and this national pride, compounded by exploitation of workers b



   Directions: Some people say that the best preparation for life is learning to be competitive. Others take the opposite view and say that learning to be cooperative is the best preparation. Tell which one you agree with and explain why. (120-150 wor ...


   大学英语议论文范文 【大学英语议论文范文】 The politics of protest(布迪厄) Pierre Bourdieu has become a leading figure in the radical movements that have swept Franc e in the last few years. He talked to Kevin Ovenden about anti-capitalism and resistance The Weight of the ...


   11   根据以下要点写一篇议论文,阐述一下广告已成为当今社会很重要的一种行业,词数 100 左右。   (1)广告不仅能促销,还能提供给我们各种最新消息。   (2)广播、电视及电脑使广告成为我们日常生活中的一个重要部分。   (3)广告业还提供了许多了就业机会。   12   写一篇关于礼貌的文章,大致内容如下:礼貌对每个人来说都非常重要。有礼貌的人从来不在别人危急的时候讥笑他,相反却去帮助他。办事的时候要说“请”,“谢谢”。在公共场合不要大声喧哗。当你打喷嚏时或吐痰时要用手帕。作为一名学 ...


   英语议论文 王为刚 赵子豪 侯东辰 " 议论文(Argumentation)叫论说文,是一种抒发己 见、分析事物、纵横事理、提主张的一种书面文 体。其基本目的是阐述作者自己的观点,说服读 者了解并接受自己的主张。一篇有说服力的议论 文必须论理严谨,逻辑紧密,分析透彻,说理充 分。据统计了从1987年9月至2008年6月的41次CET 4考试的写作题,发现大学英语四级考试短文写 作的呈现多样性,但其中以议论文写作所占的比 重最大,共考了19次,比例达到了46.3%。由此 可以看出议论文在大学 ...


   Information technology is significantly changing the operating practices of an increasing number of companies globally. These developments have important implications for the accounting profession and in particular accounting practices in the twent ...


   英语议论文写作模板 英语议论文写作模板 议论文写作 1.利弊议论文 Model 1 It is a new thing that. Many people welcome this new development while others have expressed their concern about this. Those who take sides against this new trend believe that because. One common argument, ...


   问题解决型作文模板 问题解决型模板一 TOPIC ① With the of , . ② So it is of great importance for us to . ③ On one hand, . ④ On the other hand, . ⑤ However, we have figured out many ways to . ⑥ Firstly, . ⑦ So long as . ⑧ Secondly, ⑨ Thirdly, . ⑩ In fact, . 11. That i ...


   议论文写作技巧 UNIT 1 What Attitude Should We Take to Sth1. 社会上对某事物的错误观念 2. 分析批驳其错误所在 3. 给出如何看待该事物的建议 写作模式(批驳分析类) 写作模式(批驳分析类) 1) With the arrival / birth of …, sth. is becoming more and more … in our life. 2) Hit / Affected with this trend, some / many pe ...


   高中英语议论文的写作方法与技巧      高中英语议论文的写作,大多有具体要点(即论点或论据)的限定,所以并不需要如何地纵横捭阖,如何地旁征博引。但是,麻雀虽小,五脏俱全,一篇100来字的议论文,同样必须逻辑严密,结构清晰,语言洗练,必须论有中心,言而有据。以下笔者试从篇章结构、句子修辞和词汇运用等三个方面来谈一谈写好一篇小议论文的基本方法和技巧。 一、篇章结构 (一)先有规矩,然后才能从心所欲,不逾矩   议论文的写作,住往从正反两方面来论述,且都有其约定俗成的议论模式,即从“主题句一正面 ...


   2010 年考研英语作文议论文写作范文 UNIT Ⅰ九大主题词汇 一 计算机、通讯类 1 计算机 commit computer crimes 进行电脑犯罪活动 Most computer crimes can be traced back to hackers. 大多数计算机犯罪都是电脑黑客干 的。 access the Internet 进入互联网 accomplish the operation simply with a click of the keys 敲击键盘即可完成操作 ad ...



   灿烂的语言,只能点缀感情,如果我沉默,代表我真的喜欢你 26、自由代表的是内心永久的孤独。 、自由代表的是内心永久的孤独。 27、现实太假,还是自己太傻? 、现实太假,还是自己太傻? 28、一切因为寂寞,才开始了暧昧。 、一切因为寂寞,才开始了暧昧。 29、生活的真正意义是:生下来,活下去。 、生活的真正意义是: 生下来,活下去。 30、年龄不是差距,身高不是距离。 、年龄不是差距,身高不是距离。 31、人生是一张单程车票,没有后退,没有返回! 、人生是一张单程车票,没有后退,没有返回! 3 ...


   2010 年高校招生考试英语(全国 1 卷)参考答案 年高校招生考试英语( ...


   免费外贸平台实惠网资料编辑站 2011-1-17 本 文 档 来 源 于 实 惠 网 外 贸 论 坛 ( )你也可以加入外贸交流 BATILK 蜡染 BEARER 袋衬 BEARER & FACING 袋衬袋贴 BEDFORD CORD. 坑纹布,经条灯心绒 BELL BOTTOM 喇叭裤脚 BELLOWS POCKET 风琴袋 BELT 腰带 BELT-LOOP 裤耳 BIAS CUT 斜纹裁,纵纹裁 BIFURCATE 分叉 BINDER 包 ...


   麻省理工要求本科生三年看完的电影 来源: 来源: 严靓的日志 麻省理工要求本科生三年看完的电影 动画和电影可以帮我们更深刻地体验人生。 1. 2001 Kubrick, Stanley 1968(《漫游太空 2001,库布利克》) 2. Accattone Pasolini, Pier Paolo 1961(《乞丐》,帕索里尼) 3. Babette's Feast Axel, Gabriel 1987(《芭贝特的盛宴》) 4. Battleship Potemkin, The Eisens ...


   植物英语单词的词源_X空间百度空间 | 百度首页 | 登录 X空间当有了想要舒服想法时,无非想要各种不同的温柔对待自己,相对地给予温柔就是爱,想要各种温柔就是贪。 主页博客相册|个人档案 |好友 查看文章 植物英语单词的词源2008年09月02日 星期二 上午 10:46植物名称由来 aconite 乌头 aconite是一种含剧毒的植物,汉语通称“乌头”。由于昔日人们用它来毒杀恶狼,故英文有wolfsbane,汉语有“狼毒”之称;又因其花形似修道士袍服上的兜帽, ...