The Year2/ IP4 GP Teaching Team would like to thank a) the writers for agreeing to share their essays and b) the team of teachers who put the compilation together.
NOTE: These essays are not meant to be “model” essays for rotelearning. Use them intelligently.
10 October 2008
NJC GP Prelims 2008 ? Best Essays Q
  3. Is history merely the story told by the winners? Some people, in their attempt to simplify the concept of history, have actually come up with a new, two-syllable name for it. History is “his story” ? story of the past formularised and told by “Him”, the winner. The very fact that this phrase actually sounds like the word history itself may come as an amusing coincidence at first glance. However, upon further examination of the history of mankind itself, we realise there are some elements of relevance and truth in this renaming. History bears minimal resemblance to “story” books in literature, in so far as it does contain fictional and romanticised details, and indeed, in some cases especially in the distant past, history was solely told by the winners. However, history is much more than that. It is at its core an attempt by mankind to map human behavioural and developmental patterns. In today’s globalised and increasingly democratised world, it is for most parts fair, not favouring either the winning or losing side. It must also be noted that a large portion of history is dedicated to examining events in which there is no winner. To liken the retelling of history to an account given in a story book ? a work of fiction ? is to suggest that history, too, contains fictitious elements and is at best an illustration of a fragmented, romanticised, largely unreal truth. There is certainly a level of relevance in this argument. Let us be honest, who could have come back from the Stone Age and told historians how life was back then? Indeed, when one examines the history of pre-historic Man tens of millions of years ago, it is just an educated guess by a group of scholars on what the past could have been like. Like all kinds of speculations, this one, too, contains bias and the human innate tendency to view the past as a better and simpler time than it really was, certainly tends to inflate the good parts and paint an overly rosy picture. However, one must acknowledge the extensive effort made by modern historians to rely on empirical findings by anthropologists and palaeontologists to formulate a “story” of the past that is closest to the truth. Furthermore, modern attempts at writing history are not individual but are often collective ones that involve a group of historians, thus reducing the risk of bias and oversight. The second premise put forth by the question, that history is told by the “winners” is to some very limited extent accurate, especially when we look at how history was told in the feudalistic, monarchic past of mankind. In the times of Egyptian, Roman and more recently, Chinese, Empires, history was equivalent to the history of warfare, when kings and emperors sought to expand their territories and conquer new lands. The prevalence of one kingdom and one leader, in these battles over territories was often tantamount to the annihilation of the other, giving the winners the sole right to brag about their victory and how it had been achieved. Chinese emperors have been known to burn all artefacts and works of art that told the glorious achievements of the previous rulers and oversee the writing of a whole new range of history books that elevate the victorious to the rank alongside the Gods. One must remember that in these totalitarian regimes, the King possessed the ultimate power to dictate how history was written and understandably, that history conveniently forgot about the existence of the losers and just focused on the winners. Moreover, even after the victorious King had passed away, stories told about him by the society that reaped benefits from his conquests often contained factual distortions in a bid to honour the name of their leader. For example, King Ramses II of Egypt was ambushed during his passing of the Sinai desert and lost his life in a dishonourable way. Yet, until the late 1980s historical stories told about him did not display this part, clearly because the historians of that time chose to “forget” this about the victorious King.
However, such pseudo-historical accounts of the past that are solely determined by and therefore clearly in favour of the winners hardly exist in this modern time. The globalised and relatively open society we live in today allows for easy access to national archives and debate over versions of history across national boundaries, thus limiting factual distortions by the ruling governments. In addition, the existence of photography and video cameras has negated the possibility of atrocities committed by the victorious being simply “ignored”. History as it is taught in schools in most democratic countries nowadays is by and large a universally accepted version of what the past was like. Take for example the Cold War. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, the US under George H. W. Bush claimed victory. If Bush were the ruler of one homogenised globe, his announcement might have been put down in history textbooks as the official truth. But thankfully, he was not. Historians like John Lewis Gaddis then accessed the Soviet archives and their enduring works now presented everyone a balanced version of history that reveals not the US as the winner, but simply, the Soviet Union as the loser who gave up the war in 19
  91. Moreover, as countries now take special interest in verifying other countries’ versions of history, bias is minimised, as clearly seem in the recent outcry over the failure of Japanese history textbooks to address atrocities committed by the Japanese military in Nanjing, China, during World War Two. Clearly, the “losers” have a say in how history is written, for unlike in the far past, they are certainly not wiped out, but alive, thriving and demanding that their defeat be portrayed in the fairest possible way. Some might say that in modern authoritarian regimes such as Burma or Vietnam, surely the official histories contain a plethora of biases and half-truths. This is true, but the versions of history propagated by these regimes are not “official”, by globally accepted standards, but are nationally influenced. The fact that the world outside of these regimes is able to grab hold of a fairer version of history reaffirms the fact that history as told in our modern time is by no means merely a vehicle of propaganda by the victorious party. Moreover, the availability of different historical accounts from the West, albeit limited, in these countries has started to fuel protests demanding the governments to re-evaluate national history textbooks. We thus have reasons to believe that the global population will one day all have access to fair and objective accounts of history. One assumption made by the question which I find most flawed, is that historical accounts all contain a “winner”, suggesting that history is nothing more than the study of warfare. This is most inaccurate. History is at its core the study of human behavioural and developmental patterns to prevent the reoccurrence of past tragedies, and more often than not it does not tell the tale of any victorious country. The study of Cold War history, as mentioned above, clearly is not about any winner whatsoever, but rather is a stern warning of the dangers of leaving the fate of the world and its billions of citizens in the hands of two expansionistic superpowers. It fuels citizen activism and encourages people worldwide to exercise active citizenship and keep their leaders in check. The history of disasters, like the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant explosion, and genocidal events in Darfur or Rwanda, is not about the winners, for there is none. Rather, it activates global awareness of the need for international intervention in authoritarian regimes ruled by genocidal and greedy rulers. History also maps the scientific achievements and failures of mankind. History, to put simply, offers us a closer, largely unbiased, glimpse into how the human race has been evolving. To say that history is merely the story told by the winners is to over-generalise one of the most complex and fascinating concepts of mankind. Such understanding of the concept of history is a mere fragment of the truth, for history is about much more than the documentation of battles and conflicts where there are clear winners. Modern history is a
largely objective and educated attempt to study why and how human beings behave the way they do, and this sometimes has nothing to do with winning or losing. By Michelle Nguyen Bich Ngoc 05IP02 Marker’s Comments: An insightful answer. You could perhaps have dealt with the value of history more thoroughly.
NJC GP 2008 Prelims - Best Essays Q
  6. ‘The best way to alleviate poverty in developing nations is for richer countries to invest heavily in them.’ Discuss this view. As economies around the world continue to integrate in terms of ideas, investments and labour, the group of people opposing this trend of globalisation also continues to grow in number, as is evident in the numerous protests that are staged every time the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund have meetings. A significant majority of this group of opponents opposes the concept of foreign investments from richer countries in developing countries claiming that such investments enslave and exploit local people rather than freeing them from the cycle of poverty. However, proponents of globalisation chose to differ, claiming that such increased foreign investments have provided employment for and improved the lives of millions of people in developing countries. I believe that while such investment may be beneficial to some extent, it definitely cannot be named as the best way to free the people in developing nations from the shackles of poverty. In fact, local governments should take the initiative to develop their own industries rather than depend solely upon foreign investment, because the eventual success of foreign investment in reducing poverty levels is determined by factors such as the rate of economic growth of a country, the social outlook of its people and the efficiency of its government. The rate of economic growth of a country is an important factor that determines whether foreign investment could be successful in reducing poverty levels in developing countries. Developing nations such as India and China have attracted large amounts of foreign investments from richer countries. These foreign investments, for example, the call centres of major American companies located in India, have provided employment for thousands of Indians, many of whom were initially living below the poverty level. With a stable income from these outsourced jobs, a large proportion of the poor in India have been brought above the poverty level, and poverty levels in India have decreased from 63% in 1990 to 31% in 20
  01. However, the reason why foreign investments were successful in India is because of the high growth rates of its domestic sectors which encouraged foreign investments. This is in contrast to the effects of foreign investment in developing African countries such as Sierra Leone, where the exploitation of the workers by foreign multinational companies led to strikes and lockouts which worsened the unemployment problem and led to increased poverty levels. The reason for this was because the domestic economy of Sierra Leone had not experienced significant growth which in turn allowed foreign investments to exploit these workers by giving them low wages and making them work overtime since these workers could not switch to other jobs in domestic industries. Thus, although foreign investment might be successful in some countries, its success eventually depends upon the growth of the domestic economy which can only be driven by an efficient and pragmatic local government. Thus, the local government should take the initiative to develop the economy first before inviting foreign investments, so as to reduce poverty levels. Another factor that determines the success of foreign investment in developing countries is the mindset of the local people. Quite often, those developing countries happen to be those that recently achieved independence from foreign powers and hence, the people of these countries tend to have a sense of pride in their newfound freedom. This pride is tainted when these people have to work in foreign firms located in their own country. While these firms may provide employment and help the people escape from poverty, their presence often creates unrest among local people whom feel that they have once again been enslaved by
foreign powers. These people believe that their own country is equally capable of producing successful local firms and millionaires, and this national pride, compounded by exploitation of workers b



   大学英语议论文范文 【大学英语议论文范文】 The politics of protest(布迪厄) Pierre Bourdieu has become a leading figure in the radical movements that have swept Franc e in the last few years. He talked to Kevin Ovenden about anti-capitalism and resistance The Weight of the ...


   11   根据以下要点写一篇议论文,阐述一下广告已成为当今社会很重要的一种行业,词数 100 左右。   (1)广告不仅能促销,还能提供给我们各种最新消息。   (2)广播、电视及电脑使广告成为我们日常生活中的一个重要部分。   (3)广告业还提供了许多了就业机会。   12   写一篇关于礼貌的文章,大致内容如下:礼貌对每个人来说都非常重要。有礼貌的人从来不在别人危急的时候讥笑他,相反却去帮助他。办事的时候要说“请”,“谢谢”。在公共场合不要大声喧哗。当你打喷嚏时或吐痰时要用手帕。作为一名学 ...


   题目:使用电脑的利弊 People can go to shop, bank and work with computer. But the danger of the computer is people are getting isolated and losing some social skills. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 范文: The progression of computer is inevitable ...


   英语作文之说明原因型   These days we often hear that (1).It is common that (2). Why does such circumstance occur in spite of social protects? For one thing, (3).For another, (4). What is more, since (5),it is natural that (6).To solve the problem is not eas ...


   Information technology is significantly changing the operating practices of an increasing number of companies globally. These developments have important implications for the accounting profession and in particular accounting practices in the twent ...


   英语议论文写作模板 英语议论文写作模板 议论文写作 1.利弊议论文 Model 1 It is a new thing that. Many people welcome this new development while others have expressed their concern about this. Those who take sides against this new trend believe that because. One common argument, ...


   ★★★议论文的框架 (1) 不同观点列举型( 选择型 ) 不同观点列举型( There is a widespread concern over the issue that __作文题目 But it is well known that the opinion 作文题目. 作文题目 concerning this hot topic varies from person to person. A majority of people think that _ 观点一 观点一. In th ...


   问题解决型作文模板 问题解决型模板一 TOPIC ① With the of , . ② So it is of great importance for us to . ③ On one hand, . ④ On the other hand, . ⑤ However, we have figured out many ways to . ⑥ Firstly, . ⑦ So long as . ⑧ Secondly, ⑨ Thirdly, . ⑩ In fact, . 11. That i ...


   专业英语议论文写作 What Makes a Good Friend? Most people know that friendship is one of the most important things in life, whatever is your status, married or single. We human beings are social animals. Ever since we were young children, we began to stay in ...


   高中英语议论文的写作方法与技巧      高中英语议论文的写作,大多有具体要点(即论点或论据)的限定,所以并不需要如何地纵横捭阖,如何地旁征博引。但是,麻雀虽小,五脏俱全,一篇100来字的议论文,同样必须逻辑严密,结构清晰,语言洗练,必须论有中心,言而有据。以下笔者试从篇章结构、句子修辞和词汇运用等三个方面来谈一谈写好一篇小议论文的基本方法和技巧。 一、篇章结构 (一)先有规矩,然后才能从心所欲,不逾矩   议论文的写作,住往从正反两方面来论述,且都有其约定俗成的议论模式,即从“主题句一正面 ...



   玄武雅阁 Part I Writing (30 minutes) 注意:此部分试题在答题卡 1 上。 Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay on the topic of Due Attention Should Be Given To Spelling. You should write at least 120 words fo ...


   1. 名词   名词可以分为专有名词(Proper Nouns)和普通名词 (Common Nouns),专有名词是某个(些)人,地方,机构等专有的名称,如Beijing,China等。普通名词是一类人或东西或是一个抽象概念的名词,如:book,sadness等。普通名词又可分为下面四类:   1)个体名词(Individual Nouns):表示某类人或东西中的个体,如:gun。   2)集体名词(Collective Nouns):表示若干个个体组成的集合体,如:family。   3) ...


   Unit 1 Hello 第一课时: 教学目标: 1、本部分主要是见面打招呼、自我介绍及道别用语的会话学习,使学生在不同的情景中听 懂、会说 Hello./Hi . Goodbye./Bye-Bye. I'm ...。 2、自我介绍用语 I’m …的发音不容易到位,学习起来较难,教师要适时纠正,切不可挫 伤孩子的学习积极性。 教学重点:本部分主要是见面打招呼、自我介绍及道别用语的会话学习,使学生在不同的情 景中听懂、会说 Hello./Hi . Goodbye./Bye-Bye. I'm . ...


   考研英语词汇词根汇总 1.aer, ar, 含义是空气,大气 aeroplane, aerial, act, ig, 含义是做,动作 active, agent, reaction 3.alt, 含义是高 altitude, 4.alter, altern, altr, 含义是其它,变更 alternate, bi, bion, 含义是生物,生命 biology, bionics(仿生学) 6.brev, bri, brief, 含义是短 brief, abbrevia ...


   特别说明 此资料来自豆丁网( 您现在所看到的文档是使用下载器所生成的文档 此文档的原件位于 感谢您的支持 抱米花 ...