2009 年 12 月 第 32 卷   6 期 第
中国英语教学 ( 双月刊) Teachi ng Englis h i n Chi na ? EL EA J our nal (Bi mont hly) C
Dec . 2009 V ol . 32 N o. 6
Abs t ract    Drawi ng on t he t heoretical f rameworks on “oracy”i n t he U K , t his st udy i nvestigated how Chi nese
English teachers concept uall y understand spoken English and p racticall y i mple ment speaki ng assess ment i n 10 middle schools i n Guangdong. Q uestionnaire survey and telep hone i nterviews were e mployed to collect t he data . Results f rom t his st udy revealed t hat many middle school English teachers did not have t he right concept ual understandi ng on “oracy”i n English . Consequentl y oral p rof iciency was not assessed f rom t he perspecti ve of language use and aut hentic com munication . The f i ndi ngs suggest a need of f urt her p rof essional develop ment f or secondary English teachers and call f or a p ractice of bot h com municati ve speaki ng assess ment and f or mati ve assess ment i n t he middle school . Ke y w o r ds English oracy ;speaki ng assess ment ; com municati ve competence
1 . Int roduction
1 . 1 Resea rch background
This resea rc h ai ms t o : ( 1 ) expl ore mi ddle sc hool Englis h t eac he rsπ unde rst a ndi ng of t he noti on of “oracy”i n Englis h , ( 2 ) i de ntif y t he t yp es a nd t he wa ys of sp ea ki ng assess me nts use d by t he m , a nd ( 3 ) i nvestigat e how t he p ercep ti on aff ects t he assess me nt p ractice . The f oll owi ng resea rc h questi ons gui de t his st udy : 1 . How do mi ddle sc hool Englis h t eac hers unde rst a nd t he noti on of “oracy” n Englis h ? i 2 . To w hat ext e nt does t he sp ea ki ng assess me nt ref lect st ude ntsπ com municative comp et e nce ? 3 . W hat a re t he t eac he rsπ p e rcep ti ons of t he p ractical diff iculties i n assessi ng sp ea ki ng ? 4 . I n w hat wa ys do seconda r y sc hool Englis h t eac hers conduct assess me nt of st ude ntsπ sp ea ki ng ?
27
O ral comp et e nce is i mp ort a nt f or lea r ners of Englis h as a Foreign L a nguage ( EFL ) . It is one of t he most necessa r y la nguage s kills t o de monst rat e t hei r la nguage comp et e nce . The ulti mat e ai m of oral Englis h st udy f or EFL lea r ne rs s houl d be t he acquisiti on of oral com municati ve comp et e nce , t hat is , t he a bilit y t o sp ea k app r op riat ely i n cont ext ( Hymes 1971 ; Mor r ow 1977 ; Wi ddows on 1978 ; Ca ndli n 1980 ; Wells 1981 ; Ca nale 1983 ; Bac h ma n 1990 ) . However , as t he Englis h la nguage t eac hi ng i n ma ny mi ddle sc hools i n Chi na is exa m2orie nt e d , muc h e mp hasis has bee n p ut on st ude ntsπ li nguistic comp et e nce suc h as t he r ot e me morizati on of voca bula r y a nd gra m ma r rat he r t ha n on la nguage comp et e nce ( Zuo 1990 ) . Suc h a t est2orie nt e d t eac hi ng a nd lea r ni ng p ractice als o negatively af f ect t he sp ea ki ng assess me nt . St ude ntπ s oral p r of icie ncy is of t e n not assessed f r om t he p e rsp ective of la nguage use a nd com municati on . Ma ny Englis h t eac hers do not ha ve suf ficie nt underst a ndi ng on vali dit y a nd relia bilit y f or sp ea ki ng assess me nt . Com municative assess me nt has receive d lit tle at t e nti on .
1 . 2 Resea rch objectives
MIDDL E SCHOOL ENG ISH TEACHERSπ PERCEPTIONS OF L ORACY AND THEIR PRACTICE OF SPEAKING ASSESSMENT
? 1994-2010 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved.
Fe ng Bi ngqi ng Gua ngdong Teac he rsπ College of Foreign L a ngua ge a n d A rts
http://www.cnki.net
5 . W hat is t he sp ea ki ng assess me nt f or a nd how f a r does it ha ve i mp act on w hat is t aught i n t he classr oom ?
2 . Theoretical background
A ndrew Wil ki nson ( 1965 , cit e d i n Dixon 1988 ) f i rst playe d wit h t he w or d “oracy ” Accor di ng t o . hi m , “oracy ”is oneπ oral s kills t o com municat e , t o discuss , t o negotiat e , t o conve rse , w hic h is as s f unda me nt al t o educati on as lit e racy a nd nume racy ; it is not a subject but a conditi on of lea r ni ng i n all subjects ( i bi d ) . I n ge neral t e r ms , sp ea ki ng a nd list e ni ng a re usually sai d t o relat e t o la nguage exp ressed t hr ough t he aural me dium , a nd sp ea ki ng is sai d t o be active w he reas list e ni ng is sai d t o be p assive . However , accor di ng t o Wi ddows on ( 1978 ) , it might be p ositively mislea di ng. To rep rese nt t he m i n t his way , as wit h ref ere nce t o la nguage t eac hi ng , w he re t he ai m of t he la nguage course is t o devel op a n a bilit y t o ha ndle sp oke n la nguage , w hat lea r ne rs need ulti mat ely t o acqui re is a n awa re ness of how t he la nguage bei ng lea r ned is use d f or t al ki ng.
3 . 1“Oracy”in t he U . K. As Frat e r ( 1988 ) st at e d , i n t he ea rly p e ri od bef ore 1960s , t he cur riculum i n t he U . K. was delive red i n a n esse ntially p rescrip tive mode . Writi ng ha d t he al most exclusi ve p restige a nd Receive d Pr onunciati on ( R P) was t oo of t e n t he stifli ngly resp ect a ble measure a nd model of app r op riat e sp eec h . I n p a rticula r , t he r ole of t al k i n lea r ni ng , its i mp ort a nce i n t he s hapi ng of t hought , t he i nt e r nalizi ng of concep ts , t he devel op me nt of a rgume nts , a nd of its i nt e rplay wit h t he ot he r la nguage mode , we re lit tle unde rst ood . I n t he 1960s , Wil ki ns on ( cit ed i n Dixon 1988 ) a nd his ea rly colleagues recognized t he i mp ort a nce of t he sp oke n w or d f or t he sc hool cur riculum . Si nce t he n , t he e ducati onal sce ne i n Engla nd has wit nessed e nor mous st r uct ural c ha nges . Fi rst , t he p ublic exa mi nati on syst e m gua ra nt ee d a place f or t he sp oke n w or d . A nd t he n , i n 1975 , ca me t he B ull oc k rep ort ( D ES 1975 ) , w hic h conf i r me d t he i mp ort a nce of oracy i n t he cur riculum . The t eac hi ng p r of essi on i n Engla nd was agreed up on “t he i mp ort a nce of t he sp oke n w or d i n t he cur riculum a nd t he nee d f or a st re ngt he ne d e mp hasis up on it i n t he w or k of sc hools ” ( D ES 1986 : 31 . 12 ) . Begi nni ng i n 1987 , oracy received ce nt ral f undi ng under t he Educati on Supp ort Gra nts ( ES G) mec ha nis m , w hic h mea nt not only t hat sp oke n w or d was t a ke n r oot on a wi de scale , but als o t hat a va riet y of t houghtf ul a nd res ourcef ul app r oac hes t o its devel op me nt we re e mergi ng nati onwi de . I n a dditi on t o a nd li n ke d wit h t he ES G app a rat us , a Nati onal O racy Pr oject was f urt he r f unde d t o supp ort t he devel op me nt of t he sp oke n w or d i n t he sc hool cur riculum .
The Assess me nt of Pe rf or ma nce U nit ( A PU ) was est a blis hed t o monit or t he corp orat e p e rf or ma nce of p upils i n t he nati onπ sc hools . It hol ds t hat t al k is used f or a wi de ra nge of com municative p urp ose a nd s diff e re nt p urp oses requi re diff e re nt t yp es of t al k , a nd list e ni ng s houl d not be a rtif iciall y sep a rat ed f r om
28
I n t he app r oac h of t he assess me nt of Perf or ma nce U nit i n B rit ai n , t al k is als o e mp hasize d a nd t he def i niti ons of oral comp et e nce app ea r t o be p r oceedi ng al ong br oa dly f uncti onal li nes . Some p ri nciples a bout oracy a re ma de explicitly t hat t al k is use d f or a wi de ra nge of com municative p urp ose ; dif f e re nt p urp oses requi re dif f e re nt t yp es of t al k , w hic h i mplies t hat no one st yle or regist e r of sp eec h will be app r op riat e f or all sit uati on ; list e ni ng s houl d not be a rtif icially sep a rat ed f r om sp ea ki ng as t he most nat ural uses of list e ni ng occur wit hi n conve rsati on a nd discussi on ( B r ookes 1987 ) . Theref ore , t he wor k of t he Assess me nt of Pe rf or ma nce U nit p r op oses a model w hic h def i nes a ra nge of com municative f uncti ons or p urp oses suc h as na r rati ng , descri bi ng a nd rep orti ng , a nd a va riet y of “a udie nces ” Comp et e nce i n . oracy is t he n evaluat ed i n t er ms of t he a bilit y t o com municat e ef f ectively on a ra nge of t as ks exe mplif yi ng t he va ri ous combi nati ons of a udie nce a nd p urp ose . Theref ore , descri bi ng a nd sp ecif yi ng , i nf or mi ng/ exp oundi ng , a rgui ng/ p ersua di ng , f ocused questi oni ng , evaluati on of evi de nce/ colla borative discussi on or p r oble m2solvi ng a nd sp eculati ng/ a dva nci ng hyp ot heses se rve as t he ge ne ral p urp oses of t he oral t as ks ca r ried out i n t he sc hools ( B r ookes 1987 ) .
3 . Educa tional context
As sp ea ki ng assess me nt is cl osel y relat e d t o oracy , t heref ore , t he hist or y of oracy i n t he e ducati onal cont ext bot h i n t he U . K. a nd i n Chi na is f i rst brief ly reviewed .
Mi ddl e School Eng l i s h Teache r s π Pe r cep t i ons of Or acy and The i r Pr ac t i ce of Sp eak i ng As s es sment
? 1994-2010 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved.
http://www.cnki.net
Feng Bi ngqi ng
sp ea ki ng because t he most nat ural use of list e ni ng occurs wit hi n conversati on a nd discussi on ( A PU 1984 , cit ed i n Frat er 1988 ) . As a result , a mong t eac hers it is plai n t hat t here is st r ong supp ort f or t he e n ha nce me nt of t he sp oke n w or d a nd clea r app reciati on of its i mp ort a nce i n t he lea r ni ng p r ocess .
3 . 2“Oracy”in China
As ea rly as i n 1981 , t he St at e Educati on Devel op me nt Com missi on ( S ED C ) issued t he nati onal unif ie d sylla bus w hic h was st ruct ured2base d a nd set la nguage knowle dge as t he mai n t eac hi ng goal i n or de r f or st ude nts t o “lay a s oli d f oundati on f or f urt her st udies ” U nder t his gui deli ne , “87 % of t eac he rs i n . Chi naπ mi ddle sc hools used t he t ra diti onal met hod i n t he lat e 1980s ”( Zuo 1990 : 40 ) . I n t he la nguage s class r ooms i n most mi ddle sc hools , it was com mon t hat t he la nguage t eac her domi nat ed t he class a nd gave t he st ude nts one2wa y i nst r ucti on a bout li nguistic knowle dge . Teac he rs wit h ass ociat ed degrees a nd wit h seconda r y dipl omas we re 4 % a nd 29 % resp ectively ( Zuo 1990 : 34 ) . As a result , t he t ra diti onal t eac hi ng met hod a nd def icie nt t eac he rs p r oduce d unsatisf act or y t eac hi ng results . St ude nts beca me al most‘deaf a nd dumb ’af t er six yea rs of Englis h st udy i n t he mi ddle sc hools a nd ha d lit tle a bilit y t o sp ea k a nd underst a nd Englis h . I n or de r t o i mp r ove st ude ntsπ unsatisf act or y comp et e nce i n t he use of Englis h f or com municati on , i n t he 1990s , t he S ED C st at ed i n t he new sylla bus t hat Englis h t eac hi ng ai ms we re ,“by t rai ni ng i n list e ni ng , sp ea ki ng , rea di ng a nd w riti ng , t o t eac h st ude nts i n or de r t o gai n basic knowle dge of Englis h a nd comp et e nce t o use Englis h f or com municati on ” ( Englis h Teac hi ng Sylla bus 1992 : 1 ) . To ac hieve t his ai m , t he S ED C st at ed explicitly t hat t eac hi ng s houl d st a rt wit h list e ni ng a nd sp ea ki ng , drills on la nguage f or m s houl d not be excessive , Englis h s houl d be use d i n class a nd use of t ra nslati on s houl d be li mit ed ( i bi d ) . I n a dditi on t o e ncouragi ng t he t eac hers t o t a ke i n2ser vice t rai ni ng t o up gra de t hei r Englis h p r of icie ncy , t he S ED C ha d a ref or m i n t he Mat riculati on Englis h Test ( M E T ) , w hic h is one Nati onal College Ent ra nce Exa ms devel op e d by t he S ED C . Bef ore 1992 , t he M E T t est only ha d t he “la nguage usage secti on ”t o assess li nguistic comp et e nce on p honetics , sp elli ng , gra m ma r a nd voca bula r y. Af t e r 1992 , list e ni ng t o dial ogues a nd a nsweri ng questi ons , rea di ng comp re he nsi on a nd comp ositi ons were a dde d t o measure st ude ntsπ s kills f or com municati on . Those w ho wa nt t o t a ke Englis h as a maj or i n universit y a re also requi re d t o t a ke sp ea ki ng assess me nt . I n ma ny mi ddle sc hools , sp ea ki ng assess me nt is ca r ried out bot h i n se ni or a nd juni or sc hools . Howeve r , comp a red wit h U . K. , w hose w or k on oracy places t al k at t he ce nt re of t he lea r ni ng p r ocess , “oracy ”i n Chi na is still t he t ra diti onal st ruct ure of t eac he r2di rect e d model .
4 . The p resent st udy
4 . 1 The met hodology
4 . 2 The p a rticip a nts
This st udy used t he qualit ative app r oac h . Tw o qualit ative dat a collecti on t ec h ni ques we re use d . Op e n2e nded questi onnai re was f i rst use d t o get t eac he rsπ concep t ual unde rst a ndi ng of oracy i n Englis h , opi ni ons on sp ea ki ng assess me nt as well as t hei r p r of essi onal , educati onal , a nd p e rsonal backgr ound . The n , t he se mi2st r uct ured i nt e r views wit h s ome of t he p a rticip a nts were conduct ed f or f urt he r cla rif icati on a nd see ki ng t eac he rsπ ref lecti ons . As t his resea rc h was done i n t he U . K. , t he questi onnai re was se nt by e2mail a nd t he i nt e r views were conduct e d ove r t he p hone .
29
A questi onnaire ( App e ndix A ) was a dmi nist ere d i n t e n mi ddle sc hools i n Gua ngdong , Chi na by e2 mail a nd t wel ve ret ur ned t he complet ed su
 

相关内容

中学英语教师对英语口语的理解和测试操作_英文_

   2009 年 12 月 第 32 卷   6 期 第 中国英语教学 ( 双月刊) Teachi ng Englis h i n Chi na ? EL EA J our nal (Bi mont hly) C Dec . 2009 V ol . 32 N o. 6 Abs t ract    Drawi ng on t he t heoretical f rameworks on “oracy”i n t he U K , t his st udy i nvestigated how Chi ...

英语口语

   1000句最常用英语口语 1. I see. 我明白了。 2. I quit! 我不干了! 3. Let go! 放手! 4. Me too. 我也是。 5. My god! 天哪! 6. No way! 不行! 7. Come on. 来吧(赶快) 8. Hold on. 等一等。 9. I agree。 我同意。 10. Not bad. 还不错。 11. Not yet. 还没。 12. See you. 再见。 13. Shut up! 闭嘴! 14. So long. 再见。 15 ...

英语口语

   27 每天读一遍,坚持27 27天,你的英语水平就可以达到跟美国人交流的 水平啦! 来源: 王涛的日志 What are you trying to say?(你到底想说什么?) Don't be silly.(别胡闹了。 ) How strong are your glasses?(你近视多少度?) Just because.(没有别的原因。 ) It isn't the way I hoped it would be.(这不是我所盼望的。 ) You will never guess.( ...

英语口语

   " 背完,你的英语口语绝对不成问题了(转) Absence makes the heart grow fonder. 小别胜新婚。 After you. 您先。 Allow me. 让我来。 Any day will do. 哪一天都行夕 Any messages for me? 有我的留言吗? Any thing else? 还要别的吗? Any urgent thing? 有急事吗? Are you kidding? 你在开玩笑吧! Are you sure? 你肯定吗? As soo ...

英语口语

   Are you by yourself?你一个人来吗? Come to the point!有话直说! Do you accept plastic?收不收信用卡? Does it keep long?可以保存吗? Don't be so fussy!别挑剔了! Don't count to me!别指望我! Don't fall for it!不要上当! Don't get me wrong!你搞错了! Don't give me that!少来这套! Don't lose your hea ...

英语口语

   你敢不敢把英语说得这么漂亮? 你敢不敢把英语说得这么漂亮 1.我的世界不允许你的消失,不管结局是否完美. No matter the ending is perfect or not, you cannot disappear from my world. 2.爱情是一个精心设计的谎言 Love is a carefully designed lie. 3.承诺常常很像蝴蝶,美丽的飞盘旋然后不见 Promises are often like the butterfly, which dis ...

英语口语

   别人的方法我看了 还都不系统 仔细读读我的,加分那 朋友 口语水平与过四六级没太大关系。光靠大胆自信还不够。练练练,挂个 MP4 天天 听也不行,关键是系统的方法。我是英语专业毕业的,英语八级,现在当翻译, 在大学时去英语角,上课发言等都不管用,一度非常苦恼。后来发现口语练习需 要系统的方法。 建议你按照我的方法做。 买个带同声对比的复读机或 CD 或 MP4 1 语音阶段,买个学习音标书,我用的是(正音美语发音基本功)航空工业出版 社的。非常棒的纠正音的适合你的。照书上的内容练,一天俩小时 ...

英语口语

   low key 低调 I’ve been back and forth.我犹豫不定。 squeezed juice 鲜榨的果汁 juice with pulp 带果肉的果汁 side effect 副作用 he can’t come to the phone now.他 现在不能接电话 herbal tea 花草茶 ready for a refill?我再给你倒一杯吧? I love what u have done with this place.我喜欢这里的布置。 what was t ...

英语口语

   In the middle of something?正在忙吗? What are you up to?你正在做什么? Can you just give me a ballpark figure?能不能给我一个大概的数字 Bottom line: We have to turn into profit by 2002. 最重要的是: 我们必须在 2002 年前转亏为盈 The new CFO was sent to bring the company out of the red这位新的财 ...

英语口语

   1. Pull yourself together. 振作起来。 2. Keep your chin up. 别灰心。 3. Don't let it get you down. It will be over with soon. 别为此烦恼。事情很快就会过去的。 4. Don't be so miserable! 别这愁眉苦脸的。 5. Cheer up! things will work out for the best. 高兴点儿。事情会有好结果的。 6. Take ...

热门内容

初中英语知识总结大全(共50多页)

   更多英语学习资料,请访问 www.xlan.net.cn。在线学习英语,听说读写全掌握 英语语法大全 英语语法大全 初中英语语法 学习提纲 一、词类、句子成分和构词法: 1、词类:英语词类分十种: 、词类:英语词类分十种: 名词、形容词、代词、数词、冠词、动词、副词、介词、连词、感叹词。 。 1、名词 名词(n.): 表示人、事物、地点或抽象概念的名称。如:boy, morning, bag, ball, class, 名词 orange. 2、代词 代词(pron.): 主要用来代替名词。 ...

200句最实用的日常英语口语 从此不再做哑巴

   200 句最实用的日常英语口语 从此不再做哑巴 1. I see. 我明白了。 2. I quit! 我不干了! 3. Let go! 放手! 4. Me too. 我也是。 5. My god! 天哪! 6. No way! 不行! 7. Come on. 来吧(赶快) 8. Hold on. 等一等。 9. I agree。 我同意。 10. Not bad. 还不错。 11. Not yet. 还没。 12. See you. 再见。 13. Shut up! 闭嘴! 14. So l ...

英语课堂游戏100种

   英语课堂游戏 100 种 “碰地雷”:在英语单词教学中,学生不太愿意跟读。用此法不错。在一个词下放一个地雷, 这个词是不能读的,如果学生不小心跟读,就是踩到雷了。大家一起数 one two three,bo mb,向他砸过去!有趣,气氛也好,学生在玩中也学得扎实! 2、补全句子:在学习句中,要慢读,必要时分解读。在跟读几遍后,可以让学生补全老师 没说完的部分。比如:my name is rebecca.可让学生补 rebecca、is rebecca、name is r ebecca。这是个 ...

英语四、六级报名通知

   教务通知〔2010〕32 号 关于 2010 年下半年 CET4、CET6 考试报名的通知 、 各学院、继续教育学院、研究生处: 2010 年下半年全国大学英语四、六级(CET4、CET6)考试开始报名, 现将有关事项通知如下: 一、报名对象: 报名对象: 仅限于我校在籍学生。 1、CET4 (1) 2007、2008、2009 级本科学生; (2)已通过 PRETCO-A 的成教、高职高专学生; (3)研究生。 2、CET6 四级成绩达到 425 分(含 425 分)以上的在籍学生。 二、 ...

人教版高一英语必修3 Unit 3 The Million Pound Bank-Note全单元教案

   Unit 3 The Million Pound Bank-Note I.教学内容分析 . 本单元的主要内容是根据马克?吐温的名著《百万英镑》改编而成的剧本中的几个片断 以及马克?吐温的生平简介。 Warming Up 通过对马克?吐温及其作品的讨论引发学生学习兴趣,使学生对马克?吐温 及其作品有个初步的了解。 Pre-reading首先要求学生回答几个相关的问题,并让他们展开想象,借助讨论引入到 《百万英镑》的情节。 Reading部分是详细介绍富商兄弟俩打赌把一张百万英镑的钞票给一个一无 ...